Are we swimming against the tide?

Diffusion of Light

I think it was in junior high that I first saw this illustration of inductive vs. deductive reasoning:

Deduction was associated with math and pristine abstraction:  Plato, Euclid.  Induction is messier and experimental:  Francis Bacon, Aristotle.

But in the same breath, people usually point out that we’re always doing both.  As a species, we figure stuff out and communicate it to each other by going up and down, back and forth.  We experiment, we theorize, we try again, and each direction supports the other.

In the last couple of days I’ve been reminded that higher ed makes a similar circuit, except that here the interaction may not be so constructive:

When left alone we learn experientially:  we try stuff out, notice whether it works, predict whether that means a different approach should or should not get a better result.  From specific cases up to general rules.

But when it’s time…

View original post 412 more words

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s